| COMMUNITY CONVERSATIONS 2006-2007 | CONTROLLED CHOICE | ||
| FACTOR | STRENGTH | CONCERNS/CHALLENGES | NEEDS |
| 1. Cost | No impact on title 1 Funding | Very costly option for racial/ | Additional money for bus |
| to the district. | socio-economic balance specifically in | transportation. | |
| regards to transportation. | |||
| Different schools may hire | Cost: $705.648.00 per year | ||
| differently run programs | Busses $241 bus/day | ||
| according to the "Controlled | $3856.00 per day or $705,648 for year | ||
| Choice" there. | |||
| 2. Educational Merit | Developed leadership skills; | Does ot eliminate the low | State funding hasn't |
| increased number of college | achieving student due to | increased in years; mandated | |
| students going to urban city | socio-economic issues | programs must still be maintained. | |
| mojors. | |||
| Values acquired through | |||
| working with others; fewer | |||
| racial issues | |||
| 3. Parental Involvement | Involvement should remain | Could be tension between the | More racial education needed |
| unchanged regardless of which | races (among parents) | ||
| plan is chosen. | |||
| 4. Socioeconomic Balance | Since Manchester schools | Socioeconomic percentages | Given that each school would |
| would be drawing from all | at schools can be hard to | have a theme to attract | |
| neighborhoods in town, each | gauge, since not all families | student, it is likely that some | |
| school has a shot at a repre- | who qualify for reduced or free | schools would have greater | |
| sentative mix of the socio- | lunch sign up for it. | concentrations of students | |
| economic classes of the town. | who qualify for free or reduced | ||
| lunch, thus making some | |||
| schools, and others not. | |||
| Therefore, if a student choses | |||
| a non-title school, he/she | |||
| would not have some services | |||
| available to them that they might | |||
| have had in their former | |||
| neighborhoods. | |||
| FACTOR | STRENGTH | CONCERNS/CHALLENGES | NEEDS |
| 5. Fairness | Tie potential benefits of | The greatest benefits will go | A workable system for selecting |
| magnet schools are available | to families that are motivated | students for a school when | |
| to all families. Controlled | to seek out the best match | the school has a limited number | |
| Choice gives parents options | for their child. | of slots. | |
| for their children's education | |||
| and at the same time is a | |||
| voluntary way to integrate | |||
| schools. | |||
| 6. Neighborhood Schools | Neighborhood schools are not | Some children would not be | |
| retained, though some families | able to go to the nearest | ||
| do elect (and are selected) to | school to their home. | ||
| attend a nearby schools. | |||
| Magnet schools develop a | |||
| sense of community, after | |||
| school activities, clubs, parent | |||
| training. Generally siblings are | |||
| permitted to attend the same | |||
| school. | |||
| 7. Transportation | Bus is safest mode of | Costly for "Controlled Choice" | Acceptable transit time (Bussing) |
| transportation for students. | option. | ||
| Families must be prepared to | |||
| Not many safety issues | Set up on per bus/per day | cope with the ability to get to | |
| regarding transportation. | cost structure. | schools for events, conferences, | |
| etc.-emergencies. | |||
| After school Daycare concerns | |||
| Transit time - typical day-25 | |||
| minutes. 12 minutes from one | |||
| end of town to another (without | |||
| traffic) | |||
| 8. Degree of Permanency | Difficult for the "Controlled | To establish long-term balance | |
| Choice" Option to maintain | a centralized registration would | ||
| racial/socioeconomic balance | be needed for on-going registration needs | ||
| due to increased numbers of | |||
| families moving in and out of | ie: Permanent secretaries to | ||
| district. Numbers could easily shift | complete this ongoing process. | ||
| A new plan???? | |||
| FACTOR | STRENGTH | CONCERNS/CHALLENGES | NEEDS |
| 9. Family or School Disruption | This option will only serve to | Afterschool care….an area that still | Good public education on what this plan |
| improve the learning process and | needs to be researched. | truly entails. | |
| not disrupt it. | |||
| Very misunderstood plan. | |||
| 10. Timing | State has already declared Manchester | Registration will require more work from | |
| "out of balance", therefore there is an | secretaries. Therefore secretary's time | ||
| urgency to provide a solution which does | would increase thus adding some | ||
| not allow much more time for weighing | possible costs. | ||
| options. Challenge to provide an efficient | |||
| yet effective option. | Staff for placement of all children. | ||
| Can not implement before out of compliance | |||
| 11. Change and Anxiety | Sense of control on the part of | Children possibly going to new neighborhoods | Allay fears of parents |
| parents | far from home. | Allay fears of children | |
| Effective communication of plan vital | |||
| Mechanism for siblings to attend | "White Flight" or at least "white anxiety" | "Special permits" for exceptional | |
| same school under plan. | pointed out in the literature. | situations - Pinellas County School | |
| district | |||
| 12. What is the impact of | Parents will not feel connected to schools out- | ||
| the option on political support | side of neighborhood. | ||
| for the school system? | |||
| They want children to be part of the neighborhood. | |||
| Less Choice than believed to receive. | |||